Introduction: A Constitution Rooted in
Civilisational Ethics
The Bhagavad Gita is not merely a religious
text; it is one of India’s most influential works on ethics, duty (dharma),
self-restraint, and moral action. When India framed its modern republic through
the Constitution of India, it did so in a civilisational context shaped
for centuries by the Gītā, the Ramayana,
the Upaniṣads, and Buddhist–Jain ethical traditions.
The issue
touches a profound constitutional paradox: India constitutionally guaranteed
rights before constitutionally cultivating duties. This imbalance, many
argue, has contributed to moral erosion, civic indiscipline, and systemic
corruption. Had duties been foundational rather than corrective,
India’s democratic culture might have evolved differently.
This is an attempt to explore:
- How
deeply the Gītā influenced constitutional thinking
- Why were
the Fundamental Duties omitted initially while framing the Constitution
- The
implications of their late inclusion
- The
symbolic loss caused by removing philosophical artwork from the
Constitution
- Whether
a duty-first constitutional culture could have reduced corruption
- Additional neglected ethical dimensions relevant today






